Ad is loading...
FATIX vs SLMCX
FATIX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FATIX vs SLMCX
Fidelity Advisor Technology I
Price$121.20
Change+$0.77 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.11B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$110.66
Change+$1.15 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.23B
FATIX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATIX vs. SLMCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATIX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. FATIX (6.11B). FATIX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . FATIX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: FATIX (29 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). SLMCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FATIX (0.68). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FATIX (34.00). FATIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: FATIX (0) vs SLMCX (2000). FATIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.18 vs. SLMCX (-9.31). FATIX return over 5 years is better than : 74.89 vs. SLMCX (42.51).
| FATIX | SLMCX | FATIX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.18 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.18 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.390 | -12.507 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.11B | 12.2B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.18 | -9.31 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.62 | 6.12 | 696% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.89 | 42.51 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.42 | 82.21 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...