Ad is loading...
FATKX vs FSNOX
FATKX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATKX vs. FSNOX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATKX is a Hold and FSNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FATKX (12.5B) and FSNOX (12.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FATKX pays higher dividends than FSNOX: FATKX (2.86) vs FSNOX (2.60). FATKX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: FATKX (8 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FSNOX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FATKX (0.29). FATKX (14.00) and FSNOX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. FATKX (0) and FSNOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FATKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.69 vs. FSNOX (2.49). FATKX return over 5 years is better than : 10.43 vs. FSNOX (9.76).
| FATKX | FSNOX | FATKX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.49 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.49 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.714 | 0.649 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 12.5B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 2.60 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.69 | 2.49 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.89 | 15.39 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.43 | 9.76 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...