Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FATKX vs TLWIX
FATKX vs TLWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATKX vs. TLWIX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATKX is a Hold and TLWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FATKX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. TLWIX (3.05B). FATKX (2.66) and TLWIX (2.65) have matching dividends . FATKX was incepted earlier than TLWIX: FATKX (8 years) vs TLWIX (16 years). FATKX (0.28) is less costly to investors than TLWIX (0.19). FATKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. TLWIX (12.00). FATKX has a lower initial minimum investment than TLWIX: FATKX (0) vs TLWIX (1000000). FATKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. TLWIX (7.97). TLWIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.25 vs. FATKX (8.07).
| FATKX | TLWIX | FATKX / TLWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.10 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.19 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.537 | 12.785 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 3.05B | 427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 2.65 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.80 | 7.97 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.27 | 34.51 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.07 | 24.25 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement