Ad is loading...
FATTX vs RBHHX
FATTX vs RBHHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATTX vs. RBHHX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATTX is a Hold and RBHHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FATTX (37.7B) and RBHHX (37.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FATTX pays higher dividends than RBHHX: FATTX (1.16) vs RBHHX (0.75). FATTX was incepted earlier than RBHHX: FATTX (11 years) vs RBHHX (11 years). RBHHX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FATTX (0.73). FATTX (5.00) and RBHHX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FATTX (250) and RBHHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FATTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. RBHHX (5.80). FATTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.46 vs. RBHHX (41.18).
| FATTX | RBHHX | FATTX / RBHHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.17 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.17 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.623 | -0.776 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7B | 37.7B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.75 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 5.80 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.09 | 16.93 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.46 | 41.18 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.19 | 54.00 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...