Ad is loading...
FATTX vs RBHTX
FATTX vs RBHTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATTX vs. RBHTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATTX is a Hold and RBHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FATTX (37.6B) and RBHTX (37.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FATTX pays higher dividends than RBHTX: FATTX (1.16) vs RBHTX (0.47). FATTX was incepted earlier than RBHTX: FATTX (11 years) vs RBHTX (18 years). RBHTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FATTX (0.73). FATTX (5.00) and RBHTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FATTX (250) and RBHTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FATTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. RBHTX (5.52). FATTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.46 vs. RBHTX (39.70).
| FATTX | RBHTX | FATTX / RBHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.46 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.46 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.623 | -0.834 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 37.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.47 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 5.52 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.09 | 16.19 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.46 | 39.70 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.19 | 53.54 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...