Ad is loading...
FATWX vs RFDTX
FATWX vs RFDTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATWX vs. RFDTX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATWX is a Hold and RFDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. FATWX (2.03B). RFDTX pays higher dividends than FATWX: RFDTX (2.80) vs FATWX (2.05). FATWX was incepted earlier than RFDTX: FATWX (22 years) vs RFDTX (16 years). FATWX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RFDTX (0.31). FATWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RFDTX (10.00). FATWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFDTX: FATWX (0) vs RFDTX (250). RFDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.19 vs. FATWX (7.25). RFDTX return over 5 years is better than : 27.13 vs. FATWX (15.77).
| FATWX | RFDTX | FATWX / RFDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.222 | 2.436 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 32.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 2.80 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 8.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | 13.91 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.77 | 27.13 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.57 | 35.62 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers