Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FATWX vs RFDTX
FATWX vs RFDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATWX vs. RFDTX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATWX is a Hold and RFDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.6B vs. FATWX (2.07B). RFDTX pays higher dividends than FATWX: RFDTX (2.59) vs FATWX (1.92). FATWX was incepted earlier than RFDTX: FATWX (22 years) vs RFDTX (16 years). FATWX (0.84) is less costly to investors than RFDTX (0.31). FATWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RFDTX (10.00). FATWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFDTX: FATWX (0) vs RFDTX (250). RFDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. FATWX (4.00). RFDTX return over 5 years is better than : 24.73 vs. FATWX (12.63).
| FATWX | RFDTX | FATWX / RFDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.31 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.31 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.128 | 11.718 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 32.6B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.59 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | 6.86 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.64 | 37.63 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.63 | 24.73 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.18 | 56.40 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement