Ad is loading...
FAUTX vs RFGTX
FAUTX vs RFGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAUTX vs. RFGTX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAUTX is a Hold and RFGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAUTX (45.6B) and RFGTX (45.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFGTX pays higher dividends than FAUTX: RFGTX (1.54) vs FAUTX (1.23). FAUTX was incepted earlier than RFGTX: FAUTX (11 years) vs RFGTX (16 years). FAUTX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RFGTX (0.36). FAUTX (6.00) and RFGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FAUTX (250) and RFGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. FAUTX (5.39). RFGTX (51.24) and FAUTX (49.06) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FAUTX | RFGTX | FAUTX / RFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.36 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.36 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.691 | -0.632 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.6B | 45.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.54 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | 5.80 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.94 | 15.94 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.06 | 51.24 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.29 | 63.86 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...