Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAWTX vs RBNTX
FAWTX vs RBNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAWTX vs. RBNTX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAWTX is a Hold and RBNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAWTX (16.6B) and RBNTX (16.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FAWTX pays higher dividends than RBNTX: FAWTX (0.76) vs RBNTX (0.17). FAWTX was incepted earlier than RBNTX: FAWTX (10 years) vs RBNTX (10 years). RBNTX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FAWTX (0.75). FAWTX (5.00) and RBNTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FAWTX (250) and RBNTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FAWTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.76 vs. RBNTX (8.90). FAWTX return over 5 years is better than : 49.42 vs. RBNTX (45.15).
| FAWTX | RBNTX | FAWTX / RBNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.580 | 6.268 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.6B | 16.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.17 | 437% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 8.90 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.71 | 38.14 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.42 | 45.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.36 | 82.43 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement