Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAXDX vs FFSDX
FAXDX vs FFSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAXDX vs. FFSDX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAXDX is a Hold and FFSDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFSDX has more cash in the bank: 1.92B vs. FAXDX (335M). FFSDX pays higher dividends than FAXDX: FFSDX (1.47) vs FAXDX (0.91). FAXDX was incepted earlier than FFSDX: FAXDX (6 years) vs FFSDX (6 years). FAXDX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FFSDX (0.65). FAXDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FFSDX (12.00). FAXDX (0) and FFSDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFSDX (7.38) and FAXDX (7.06) have marching annual gain over last year. FFSDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.14 vs. FAXDX (51.72).
| FAXDX | FFSDX | FAXDX / FFSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.65 | 231% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.65 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.715 | 3.177 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 335M | 1.92B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.47 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 7.38 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.56 | 34.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.72 | 55.14 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement