Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAXDX vs RDLTX
FAXDX vs RDLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAXDX vs. RDLTX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAXDX is a Hold and RDLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDLTX has more cash in the bank: 5.25B vs. FAXDX (444M). FAXDX pays higher dividends than RDLTX: FAXDX (0.80) vs RDLTX (0.73). FAXDX was incepted earlier than RDLTX: FAXDX (6 years) vs RDLTX (5 years). FAXDX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RDLTX (0.74). FAXDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RDLTX (4.00). FAXDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLTX: FAXDX (0) vs RDLTX (250). RDLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.19 vs. FAXDX (16.05). RDLTX return over 5 years is better than : 61.79 vs. FAXDX (46.57).
| FAXDX | RDLTX | FAXDX / RDLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.74 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.74 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.474 | 14.943 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 5.25B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.05 | 18.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.74 | 48.51 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.57 | 61.79 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement