Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBCX
FAYZX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
Price$13.94
Change-$0.16 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.74B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.64
Change-$0.39 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.4B
FAYZX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBCX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. FAYZX (2.74B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FAYZX (3.93) vs RLBCX (1.70). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FAYZX (10 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.84). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.71 vs. RLBCX (3.98). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 53.65 vs. RLBCX (36.15).
| FAYZX | RLBCX | FAYZX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.89 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.89 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.063 | 1.792 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 240B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.93 | 1.70 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.71 | 3.98 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.73 | 22.56 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.65 | 36.15 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement