Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAZRX vs MDXBX
FAZRX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FAZRX vs MDXBX
Franklin AZ Tax Free Income R6
Price$9.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets647.88M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
FAZRX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAZRX vs. MDXBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAZRX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. FAZRX (648M). MDXBX (3.50) and FAZRX (3.47) have matching dividends . FAZRX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FAZRX (8 years) vs MDXBX (39 years). FAZRX (0.54) and MDXBX (0.53) have similar cost to investors . MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FAZRX (10.60). MDXBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FAZRX: MDXBX (2500) vs FAZRX (1000000). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. FAZRX (1.18). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. FAZRX (-0.54).
| FAZRX | MDXBX | FAZRX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.49 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.53 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.630 | 2.061 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 648M | 2.34B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 3.50 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.18 | 1.47 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.45 | 12.98 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.54 | 5.55 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers