FBAK
Price
$221.90
Change
-$0.08 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
617.54M
12 days until earnings call
FCNCB
Price
$1805.00
Change
+$26.00 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.64B
Ad is loading...

FBAK vs FCNCB

Header iconFBAK vs FCNCB Comparison
Open Charts FBAK vs FCNCBBanner chart's image
First National Bank Alaska
Price$221.90
Change-$0.08 (-0.04%)
Volume$457
Capitalization617.54M
First Citizens BancShares
Price$1805.00
Change+$26.00 (+1.46%)
Volume$183
Capitalization20.64B
FBAK vs FCNCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCNCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBAK vs. FCNCB commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAK is a Hold and FCNCB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FBAK: $221.90 vs. FCNCB: $1805.00)
Brand notoriety: FBAK and FCNCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBAK: 95% vs. FCNCB: 238%
Market capitalization -- FBAK: $617.54M vs. FCNCB: $20.64B
FBAK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $617.54M. FCNCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBAK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCNCB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FBAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCNCB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCB is a better buy in the long-term than FBAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBAK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCNCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBAK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FCNCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCB is a better buy in the short-term than FBAK.

Price Growth

FBAK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while FCNCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBAK is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNCB($20.6B) has a higher market cap than FBAK($618M). FBAK has higher P/E ratio than FCNCB: FBAK (10.67) vs FCNCB (1.82). FCNCB YTD gains are higher at: 2.614 vs. FBAK (-4.825). FCNCB has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. FBAK (87.3M). FBAK has less debt than FCNCB: FBAK (236K) vs FCNCB (45.6B). FCNCB has higher revenues than FBAK: FCNCB (4.76B) vs FBAK (170M).
FBAKFCNCBFBAK / FCNCB
Capitalization618M20.6B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.8252.614-185%
P/E Ratio10.671.82586%
Revenue170M4.76B4%
Total Cash87.3M1.6B5%
Total Debt236K45.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBAK vs FCNCB: Fundamental Ratings
FBAK
FCNCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
553
SMR RATING
1..100
225
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
432
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCNCB's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as FBAK (83). This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBAK (55). This means that FCNCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCB's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as FBAK (22). This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FBAK (46). This means that FCNCB’s stock grew similarly to FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBAK (43). This means that FCNCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBAKFCNCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
37%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCNCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACRS2.570.06
+2.39%
Aclaris Therapeutics
EBKDY31.260.26
+0.82%
Erste Group Bank AG
CLDT8.830.04
+0.46%
Chatham Lodging Trust
SUHJY8.92-0.02
-0.22%
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
FOR26.79-0.47
-1.72%
Forestar Group

FBAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBAK and SGBG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBAK and SGBG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBAK
1D Price
Change %
FBAK100%
-0.03%
SGBG - FBAK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENBP - FBAK
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
EGFEF - FBAK
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCNCB - FBAK
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
FBPA - FBAK
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More

FCNCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCB has been closely correlated with FCNCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCNCB jumps, then FCNCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCNCB
1D Price
Change %
FCNCB100%
+1.46%
FCNCA - FCNCB
70%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
CASH - FCNCB
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
FNB - FCNCB
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
FHB - FCNCB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
AX - FCNCB
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More