Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAKX vs RLBAX
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBAKX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Balanced K
Price$31.40
Change+$0.10 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.46B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.86B
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAKX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAKX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. FBAKX (57.5B). FBAKX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBAKX (1.74) vs RLBAX (1.18). FBAKX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBAKX (17 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FBAKX (0.39). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FBAKX (24.00). FBAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBAKX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (9.42) and FBAKX (9.36) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. FBAKX (31.31).
| FBAKX | RLBAX | FBAKX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.31 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.31 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.903 | 8.565 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.5B | 254B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.18 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.36 | 9.42 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.97 | 32.14 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.31 | 35.28 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.34 | 58.06 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement