Ad is loading...
FBAKX vs RLBAX
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBAKX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Balanced K
Price$29.97
Change+$0.19 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.88B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.66
Change+$0.21 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.66B
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAKX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAKX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 239B vs. FBAKX (56.9B). FBAKX (1.63) and RLBAX (1.59) have matching dividends . FBAKX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBAKX (17 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FBAKX (29.00). FBAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBAKX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FBAKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.59 vs. RLBAX (11.41). FBAKX return over 5 years is better than : 27.96 vs. RLBAX (25.82).
| FBAKX | RLBAX | FBAKX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.387 | 1.911 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56.9B | 239B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.59 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.59 | 11.41 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.78 | 10.53 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.96 | 25.82 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.09 | 49.89 | 98% |