Ad is loading...
FBATX vs RDATX
FBATX vs RDATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBATX vs. RDATX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBATX is a Hold and RDATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBATX (3.81B) and RDATX (3.81B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBATX pays higher dividends than RDATX: FBATX (3.16) vs RDATX (2.84). FBATX was incepted earlier than RDATX: FBATX (11 years) vs RDATX (18 years). RDATX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FBATX (0.38). FBATX (250) and RDATX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBATX (7.70) and RDATX (7.53) have marching annual gain over last year. FBATX return over 5 years is better than : 23.20 vs. RDATX (22.03).
| FBATX | RDATX | FBATX / RDATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.63 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.63 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.249 | 2.243 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.81B | 3.81B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 2.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 7.53 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.57 | 9.91 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.20 | 22.03 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.63 | 26.93 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...