Ad is loading...
FBATX vs REATX
FBATX vs REATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBATX vs. REATX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBATX is a Hold and REATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBATX (3.81B) and REATX (3.81B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . REATX (3.17) and FBATX (3.16) have matching dividends . FBATX was incepted earlier than REATX: FBATX (11 years) vs REATX (18 years). FBATX (0.38) is less costly to investors than REATX (0.34). FBATX (250) and REATX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. REATX (7.84) and FBATX (7.70) have marching annual gain over last year. REATX (23.54) and FBATX (23.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBATX | REATX | FBATX / REATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.34 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.34 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.249 | 2.312 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.81B | 3.81B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.17 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 7.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.57 | 10.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.20 | 23.54 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.63 | 29.34 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...