Ad is loading...
FBATX vs RFTTX
FBATX vs RFTTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBATX vs. RFTTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBATX is a Hold and RFTTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBATX (3.81B) and RFTTX (3.81B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFTTX (3.23) and FBATX (3.16) have matching dividends . FBATX was incepted earlier than RFTTX: FBATX (11 years) vs RFTTX (16 years). FBATX (0.38) is less costly to investors than RFTTX (0.29). FBATX (250) and RFTTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFTTX (7.92) and FBATX (7.68) have marching annual gain over last year. RFTTX (22.29) and FBATX (21.68) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBATX | RFTTX | FBATX / RFTTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.29 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.29 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.595 | 2.754 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.81B | 3.81B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.23 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 7.92 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | 12.09 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.68 | 22.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.67 | 30.68 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...