Ad is loading...
FBATX vs RHATX
FBATX vs RHATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBATX vs. RHATX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBATX is a Hold and RHATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBATX (3.81B) and RHATX (3.81B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBATX (3.16) and RHATX (3.10) have matching dividends . FBATX was incepted earlier than RHATX: FBATX (11 years) vs RHATX (9 years). RHATX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FBATX (0.38). FBATX (250) and RHATX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RHATX (7.72) and FBATX (7.68) have marching annual gain over last year. FBATX (21.68) and RHATX (21.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBATX | RHATX | FBATX / RHATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.43 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.595 | 2.600 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.81B | 3.81B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.10 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 7.72 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | 11.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.68 | 21.37 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.67 | N/A | - |