Ad is loading...
FBBPF
Price
$3.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
FESNF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

FBBPF vs FESNF

Header iconFBBPF vs FESNF Comparison
Open Charts FBBPF vs FESNFBanner chart's image
FIBRA PROLOGIS REIT CTFS
Price$3.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.99K
CapitalizationN/A
First Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.7K
CapitalizationN/A
FBBPF vs FESNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBBPF vs. FESNF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBBPF is a Hold and FESNF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FBBPF: $3.15 vs. FESNF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: FBBPF and FESNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBBPF: 100% vs. FESNF: 93%
Market capitalization -- FBBPF: $4.24B vs. FESNF: $403.79M
FBBPF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $4.24B. FESNF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $403.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBBPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFESNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FBBPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FESNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FBBPF and FESNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

FBBPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -7.49% price change this week, while FESNF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +27.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.03% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBBPF($4.24B) has a higher market cap than FESNF($404M). FESNF has higher P/E ratio than FBBPF: FESNF (18.52) vs FBBPF (11.17). FESNF YTD gains are higher at: 0.578 vs. FBBPF (-33.783). FBBPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.52B vs. FESNF (90.6M). FBBPF has more cash in the bank: 7.78B vs. FESNF (79M). FESNF has less debt than FBBPF: FESNF (456M) vs FBBPF (15.8B). FBBPF has higher revenues than FESNF: FBBPF (5.58B) vs FESNF (117M).
FBBPFFESNFFBBPF / FESNF
Capitalization4.24B404M1,050%
EBITDA6.52B90.6M7,200%
Gain YTD-33.7830.578-5,842%
P/E Ratio11.1718.5260%
Revenue5.58B117M4,772%
Total Cash7.78B79M9,851%
Total Debt15.8B456M3,465%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBBPF vs FESNF: Fundamental Ratings
FBBPF
FESNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
4380
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7459
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2316

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBBPF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FESNF (78). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FESNF (100). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FESNF (80). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FESNF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBBPF (80). This means that FESNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.

FESNF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FBBPF (74). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRFRX8.450.01
+0.12%
Cohen & Steers International Realty R
EMAAX15.16-0.12
-0.79%
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions A
EQTIX17.66-0.18
-1.01%
Shelton Equity Income Investor
RGLGX23.76-0.25
-1.04%
American Funds Global Insight R-6
USLCX54.53-1.24
-2.22%
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C

FBBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBBPF and FESNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBBPF and FESNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBBPF
1D Price
Change %
FBBPF100%
+0.70%
FESNF - FBBPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRIVF - FBBPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRTF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
DREUF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
FRMUF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
More

FESNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FESNF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FESNF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FESNF
1D Price
Change %
FESNF100%
N/A
MAPIF - FESNF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LNSPF - FESNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BHR - FESNF
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.70%
DOC - FESNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
ARE - FESNF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
More