It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FBBPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFESNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FBBPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FESNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
FBBPF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while FESNF (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.52%.
Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
FBBPF | FESNF | FBBPF / FESNF | |
Capitalization | 6.12B | 450M | 1,360% |
EBITDA | 23.8B | 71.3M | 33,380% |
Gain YTD | 32.035 | 11.892 | 269% |
P/E Ratio | 4.84 | 15.02 | 32% |
Revenue | 11.8B | 101M | 11,683% |
Total Cash | 1.83B | 35.6M | 5,135% |
Total Debt | 42.1B | 462M | 9,113% |
FBBPF | FESNF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FBBPF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FESNF (18). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.
FBBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FESNF (100). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.
FBBPF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FESNF (86). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.
FESNF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FBBPF (55). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.
FESNF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as FBBPF (35). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.
FBBPF | FESNF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago48% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago17% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago39% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago38% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago63% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 7 days ago31% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FBBPF and FESNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBBPF and FESNF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBBPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FBBPF | 100% | +2.75% | ||
FESNF - FBBPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FRIVF - FBBPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EFRTF - FBBPF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
DREUF - FBBPF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
FRMUF - FBBPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FESNF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FESNF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FESNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FESNF | 100% | N/A | ||
MAPIF - FESNF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
LNSPF - FESNF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
DOC - FESNF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CHTH - FESNF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MEIYF - FESNF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |