FBBPF
Price
$2.83
Change
+$0.05 (+1.80%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
FRMUF
Price
$3.85
Change
+$0.13 (+3.49%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Ad is loading...

FBBPF vs FRMUF

Header iconFBBPF vs FRMUF Comparison
Open Charts FBBPF vs FRMUFBanner chart's image
FIBRA PROLOGIS REIT CTFS
Price$2.83
Change+$0.05 (+1.80%)
Volume$11.96K
CapitalizationN/A
Firm Capital Property Trust
Price$3.85
Change+$0.13 (+3.49%)
Volume$237
CapitalizationN/A
FBBPF vs FRMUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBBPF vs. FRMUF commentary
Jan 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBBPF is a Hold and FRMUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FBBPF: $2.83 vs. FRMUF: $3.85)
Brand notoriety: FBBPF and FRMUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBBPF: 82% vs. FRMUF: 5%
Market capitalization -- FBBPF: $4.24B vs. FRMUF: $151.01M
FBBPF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $4.24B. FRMUF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $151.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBBPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRMUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBBPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRMUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRMUF is a better buy in the long-term than FBBPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBBPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRMUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBBPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRMUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRMUF is a better buy in the short-term than FBBPF.

Price Growth

FBBPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while FRMUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.18% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBBPF($4.24B) has a higher market cap than FRMUF($151M). FRMUF has higher P/E ratio than FBBPF: FRMUF (79.37) vs FBBPF (11.17). FBBPF (0.000) and FRMUF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . FBBPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.52B vs. FRMUF (11.7M). FBBPF has more cash in the bank: 7.78B vs. FRMUF (4.79M). FRMUF has less debt than FBBPF: FRMUF (332M) vs FBBPF (15.8B). FBBPF has higher revenues than FRMUF: FBBPF (5.58B) vs FRMUF (55.2M).
FBBPFFRMUFFBBPF / FRMUF
Capitalization4.24B151M2,811%
EBITDA6.52B11.7M55,752%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio11.1779.3714%
Revenue5.58B55.2M10,114%
Total Cash7.78B4.79M162,396%
Total Debt15.8B332M4,759%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBBPF vs FRMUF: Fundamental Ratings
FBBPF
FRMUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
4363
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7794
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRMUF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBBPF (80). This means that FRMUF’s stock grew significantly faster than FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FRMUF (100). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to FRMUF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FRMUF (63). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to FRMUF’s over the last 12 months.

FRMUF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FBBPF (81). This means that FRMUF’s stock grew similarly to FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as FRMUF (94). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to FRMUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBBPFFRMUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
20%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERIC8.06N/A
N/A
Ericsson
MBCN28.05N/A
N/A
Middlefield Banc Corp
EOLS11.04N/A
N/A
Evolus
PSNYW0.14N/A
N/A
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC
SRM0.63N/A
N/A
SRM Entertainment

FBBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBBPF and FESNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBBPF and FESNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBBPF
1D Price
Change %
FBBPF100%
N/A
FESNF - FBBPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRIVF - FBBPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRTF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DREUF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRMUF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FRMUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRMUF has been loosely correlated with TUERF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRMUF jumps, then TUERF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRMUF
1D Price
Change %
FRMUF100%
N/A
TUERF - FRMUF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMMPF - FRMUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRTF - FRMUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DEXSF - FRMUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBBPF - FRMUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More