Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCG vs IWF
FBCG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FBCG vs IWF
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Price$46.04
Change+$0.52 (+1.14%)
Volume$100
Net Assets4.12B
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$407.62
Change+$4.06 (+1.01%)
Volume$1.13K
Net Assets106B
FBCG vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCG vs. IWF commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCG is a Buy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 106B vs. FBCG (4.13B). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than FBCG: IWF (0.601) vs FBCG (-1.600). FBCG was incepted earlier than IWF: FBCG (5 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FBCG (0.59). FBCG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| FBCG | IWF | FBCG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | -1.600 | 0.601 | -266% |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 106B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.19 | 311% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 12.00 | 350% |
| Yield | 0.13 | 0.45 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBCG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 84% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FBCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBCG has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBCG jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| APH - FBCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| COHR - FBCG | 77% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| ARES - FBCG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - FBCG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| AMZN - FBCG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||