Ad is loading...
FBCTX vs NSFDX
FBCTX vs NSFDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCTX vs. NSFDX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCTX is a Hold and NSFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCTX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. NSFDX (4.11M). NSFDX pays higher dividends than FBCTX: NSFDX (3.05) vs FBCTX (2.90). FBCTX was incepted earlier than NSFDX: FBCTX (11 years) vs NSFDX (8 years). NSFDX (4.30) is less costly to investors than FBCTX (0.39). NSFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FBCTX (5.00). FBCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFDX: FBCTX (250) vs NSFDX (1000000). FBCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.28 vs. NSFDX (-0.72). FBCTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.84 vs. NSFDX (-4.38).
| FBCTX | NSFDX | FBCTX / NSFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.50 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 4.30 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.842 | -1.959 | -145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 4.11M | 360,448% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 3.05 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | -0.72 | -875% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.33 | 13.28 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.84 | -4.38 | -499% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...