Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCTX vs NSFDX
FBCTX vs NSFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCTX vs. NSFDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCTX is a Hold and NSFDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCTX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. NSFDX (1.01M). NSFDX pays higher dividends than FBCTX: NSFDX (2.92) vs FBCTX (2.76). FBCTX was incepted earlier than NSFDX: FBCTX (11 years) vs NSFDX (8 years). NSFDX (3.49) is less costly to investors than FBCTX (0.39). NSFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FBCTX (5.00). FBCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFDX: FBCTX (250) vs NSFDX (1000000). FBCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. NSFDX (1.59). FBCTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.34 vs. NSFDX (-7.90).
| FBCTX | NSFDX | FBCTX / NSFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.45 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 3.49 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.826 | 2.113 | 418% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 1.01M | 1,498,016% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 2.92 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.82 | 1.59 | 616% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.90 | 17.98 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.34 | -7.90 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement