Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCTX vs NSFDX
FBCTX vs NSFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCTX vs. NSFDX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCTX is a Hold and NSFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCTX has more cash in the bank: 14.9B vs. NSFDX (2.58M). NSFDX pays higher dividends than FBCTX: NSFDX (2.99) vs FBCTX (2.84). FBCTX was incepted earlier than NSFDX: FBCTX (11 years) vs NSFDX (8 years). NSFDX (3.49) is less costly to investors than FBCTX (0.39). NSFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FBCTX (5.00). FBCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFDX: FBCTX (250) vs NSFDX (1000000). FBCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. NSFDX (0.35). FBCTX return over 5 years is better than : 20.75 vs. NSFDX (-6.70).
| FBCTX | NSFDX | FBCTX / NSFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.45 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 3.49 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.759 | 0.310 | 1,856% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.9B | 2.58M | 576,849% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 2.99 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 0.35 | 2,079% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.03 | 19.85 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.75 | -6.70 | -310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers