Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCTX vs RHCTX
FBCTX vs RHCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCTX vs. RHCTX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCTX is a Hold and RHCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCTX (15B) and RHCTX (15B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBCTX (2.75) and RHCTX (2.70) have matching dividends . FBCTX was incepted earlier than RHCTX: FBCTX (11 years) vs RHCTX (10 years). RHCTX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FBCTX (0.39). FBCTX (5.00) and RHCTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBCTX (250) and RHCTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RHCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.49 vs. FBCTX (9.02). RHCTX (19.73) and FBCTX (19.01) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBCTX | RHCTX | FBCTX / RHCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.44 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.44 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.826 | 9.445 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15B | 15B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.75 | 2.70 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | 9.49 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 19.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.01 | 19.73 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers