Ad is loading...
FBCTX vs RRCTX
FBCTX vs RRCTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCTX vs. RRCTX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCTX is a Hold and RRCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBCTX (14.8B) and RRCTX (14.8B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RRCTX (2.97) and FBCTX (2.91) have matching dividends . FBCTX was incepted earlier than RRCTX: FBCTX (11 years) vs RRCTX (16 years). FBCTX (0.39) is less costly to investors than RRCTX (0.30). FBCTX (5.00) and RRCTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBCTX (250) and RRCTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RRCTX (7.38) and FBCTX (7.34) have marching annual gain over last year. RRCTX (21.95) and FBCTX (21.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBCTX | RRCTX | FBCTX / RRCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.30 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.30 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 2.526 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 14.8B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.97 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 7.38 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.88 | 13.13 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.50 | 21.95 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.46 | 31.45 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...