Ad is loading...
FBDTX vs RFDTX
FBDTX vs RFDTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBDTX vs. RFDTX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBDTX is a Hold and RFDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBDTX (33B) and RFDTX (33B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFDTX (2.76) and FBDTX (2.70) have matching dividends . FBDTX was incepted earlier than RFDTX: FBDTX (11 years) vs RFDTX (16 years). FBDTX (0.39) is less costly to investors than RFDTX (0.31). FBDTX (250) and RFDTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFDTX (6.17) and FBDTX (6.06) have marching annual gain over last year. RFDTX (23.93) and FBDTX (23.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBDTX | RFDTX | FBDTX / RFDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.31 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.31 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.721 | 2.699 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33B | 33B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.76 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 6.17 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.15 | 11.45 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.37 | 23.93 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.54 | 40.50 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...