Ad is loading...
FBETX vs NSFFX
FBETX vs NSFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBETX vs. NSFFX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBETX is a Hold and NSFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBETX has more cash in the bank: 48.8B vs. NSFFX (17.1M). NSFFX (2.25) and FBETX (2.23) have matching dividends . FBETX was incepted earlier than NSFFX: FBETX (11 years) vs NSFFX (8 years). NSFFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FBETX (0.42). FBETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: FBETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). FBETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. NSFFX (2.92). FBETX return over 5 years is better than : 36.00 vs. NSFFX (29.93).
| FBETX | NSFFX | FBETX / NSFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.52 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.56 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.990 | 1.519 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.8B | 17.1M | 285,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 2.25 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.13 | 2.92 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.76 | 9.90 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.00 | 29.93 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers