FBGI
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.02 (-66.67%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
337.74M
JBFCF
Price
$4.20
Change
-$0.60 (-12.50%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.71B
Ad is loading...

FBGI vs JBFCF

Header iconFBGI vs JBFCF Comparison
Open Charts FBGI vs JBFCFBanner chart's image
Foodbase Group
Price$0.01
Change-$0.02 (-66.67%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization337.74M
Jollibee Foods
Price$4.20
Change-$0.60 (-12.50%)
Volume$1.39K
Capitalization4.71B
FBGI vs JBFCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBGI vs. JBFCF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGI is a Hold and JBFCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FBGI: $0.01 vs. JBFCF: $4.20)
Brand notoriety: FBGI and JBFCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBGI: 115% vs. JBFCF: 91%
Market capitalization -- FBGI: $337.74M vs. JBFCF: $4.71B
FBGI [@Restaurants] is valued at $337.74M. JBFCF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $201.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBGI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJBFCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FBGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JBFCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JBFCF is a better buy in the long-term than FBGI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBGI’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JBFCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBGI’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JBFCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JBFCF is a better buy in the short-term than FBGI.

Price Growth

FBGI (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JBFCF (@Restaurants) price change was -7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +161.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JBFCF($4.71B) has a higher market cap than FBGI($338M). FBGI YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. JBFCF (-7.895).
FBGIJBFCFFBGI / JBFCF
Capitalization338M4.71B7%
EBITDAN/A38.7B-
Gain YTD0.000-7.895-
P/E RatioN/A27.67-
RevenueN/A263B-
Total CashN/A34.2B-
Total DebtN/A105B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBGI vs JBFCF: Fundamental Ratings
FBGI
JBFCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10075
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBGI's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as JBFCF (50). This means that FBGI’s stock grew similarly to JBFCF’s over the last 12 months.

FBGI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JBFCF (100). This means that FBGI’s stock grew similarly to JBFCF’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBGI (94). This means that JBFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (57). This means that JBFCF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (100). This means that JBFCF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBGIJBFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSTR27.820.43
+1.57%
L.B. Foster Company
TEL145.722.03
+1.41%
TE CONNECTIVITY Ltd
WYY3.950.02
+0.51%
WidePoint Corp
OLPX1.58N/A
N/A
Olaplex Holdings
RDN32.94-0.15
-0.45%
Radian Group

FBGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBGI and JBFCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBGI and JBFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBGI
1D Price
Change %
FBGI100%
N/A
JBFCF - FBGI
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSSF - FBGI
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
BROS - FBGI
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
RTBRF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSPPF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JBFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JBFCF and FBGI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JBFCF and FBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JBFCF
1D Price
Change %
JBFCF100%
N/A
FBGI - JBFCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STKS - JBFCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
LKNCY - JBFCF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
JDWPF - JBFCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - JBFCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More