Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs RGAFX
FBGKX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs RGAFX
FBGKX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FBGKX (104B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FBGKX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FBGKX (0.00). FBGKX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FBGKX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FBGKX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). FBGKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FBGKX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FBGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.03 vs. RGAFX (6.44). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 63.86 vs. RGAFX (17.38).
| FBGKX | RGAFX | FBGKX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.34 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.994 | 8.020 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104B | 361B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.03 | 6.44 | 466% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.72 | 45.06 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.86 | 17.38 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 372.07 | 113.52 | 328% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers