Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs RGAFX
FBGKX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs RGAFX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K
Price$257.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$88.07
Change-$0.43 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
FBGKX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FBGKX (80.5B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FBGKX: RGAFX (0.55) vs FBGKX (0.28). FBGKX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FBGKX (17 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). FBGKX (0.40) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGKX (22.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: FBGKX (0) vs RGAFX (250). FBGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.88 vs. RGAFX (17.13). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 86.05 vs. RGAFX (50.03).
| FBGKX | RGAFX | FBGKX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.34 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.34 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.746 | 18.342 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.5B | 340B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.55 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.88 | 17.13 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.10 | 63.63 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.05 | 50.03 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 281.30 | 106.58 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement