Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs FCNTX
FBGRX vs FCNTX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FCNTX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$230.94
Change+$0.96 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.84B
FBGRX vs FCNTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. FCNTX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Buy and FCNTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. FBGRX (70.8B). FBGRX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: FBGRX (0.23) vs FCNTX (0.06). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FCNTX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FCNTX (58 years). FCNTX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.47). FBGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00). FBGRX (0) and FCNTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.69 vs. FBGRX (4.94). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 85.56 vs. FCNTX (54.04).
| FBGRX | FCNTX | FBGRX / FCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.63 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.63 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 58 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.237 | 8.274 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 157B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.06 | 402% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | 13.69 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.28 | 66.75 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.56 | 54.04 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.90 | 121.98 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement