Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs FSKAX
FBGRX vs FSKAX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FSKAX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$226.16
Change+$1.49 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.84B
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$165.40
Change+$1.55 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.88B
FBGRX vs FSKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. FSKAX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Buy and FSKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSKAX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FBGRX (70.8B). FSKAX pays higher dividends than FBGRX: FSKAX (1.09) vs FBGRX (0.23). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FSKAX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FSKAX (14 years). FBGRX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FBGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FBGRX (0) and FSKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. FBGRX (2.71). FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 104.84 vs. FBGRX (78.43).
| FBGRX | FSKAX | FBGRX / FSKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.01 | 3,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.01 | 3,133% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.100 | 1.676 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 106B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.09 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | 10.95 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.00 | 57.00 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.43 | 104.84 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.67 | 210.07 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement