Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs FSKAX
FBGRX vs FSKAX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FSKAX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$241.62
Change-$5.89 (-2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.77B
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$171.31
Change-$2.87 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.87B
FBGRX vs FSKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. FSKAX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Buy and FSKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSKAX has more cash in the bank: 114B vs. FBGRX (79.8B). FSKAX pays higher dividends than FBGRX: FSKAX (1.01) vs FBGRX (0.20). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FSKAX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FSKAX (14 years). FBGRX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FBGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FBGRX (0) and FSKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.03 vs. FSKAX (17.53). FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 102.33 vs. FBGRX (79.65).
| FBGRX | FSKAX | FBGRX / FSKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.01 | 3,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.01 | 3,133% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.954 | 8.086 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.8B | 114B | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.01 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.03 | 17.53 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.30 | 59.16 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.65 | 102.33 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.22 | 231.92 | 100% |