Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs FSYBX
FBGTX vs FSYBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 46B vs. FSYBX (8.16M). FBGTX pays higher dividends than FSYBX: FBGTX (1.44) vs FSYBX (1.30). FBGTX was incepted earlier than FSYBX: FBGTX (11 years) vs FSYBX (2 years). FSYBX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). FSYBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FSYBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: FSYBX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX (11.12) and FSYBX (10.61) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FBGTX | FSYBX | FBGTX / FSYBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.49 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.49 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.194 | 5.094 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46B | 8.16M | 563,795% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.30 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.12 | 10.61 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.39 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.78 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement