Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs MLFKX
FBGTX vs MLFKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. MLFKX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and MLFKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLFKX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: MLFKX (2.67) vs FBGTX (1.34). FBGTX was incepted earlier than MLFKX: FBGTX (12 years) vs MLFKX (9 years). MLFKX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). MLFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). MLFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: MLFKX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.75 vs. MLFKX (10.44). MLFKX (45.30) and FBGTX (45.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | MLFKX | FBGTX / MLFKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.42 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.62 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.169 | 13.173 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.2B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 2.67 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.75 | 10.44 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.01 | 38.05 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.18 | 45.30 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement