Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs RFGTX
FBGTX vs RFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. RFGTX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and RFGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX (46.6B) and RFGTX (46.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFGTX (1.51) and FBGTX (1.44) have matching dividends . FBGTX was incepted earlier than RFGTX: FBGTX (11 years) vs RFGTX (16 years). FBGTX (0.44) is less costly to investors than RFGTX (0.36). FBGTX (6.00) and RFGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBGTX (250) and RFGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFGTX (11.17) and FBGTX (11.01) have marching annual gain over last year. RFGTX (44.69) and FBGTX (44.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | RFGTX | FBGTX / RFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.36 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.36 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.447 | 7.490 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.6B | 46.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.51 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | 11.17 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.27 | 40.60 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.07 | 44.69 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.16 | 70.35 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement