Ad is loading...
FBJTX vs RCMTX
FBJTX vs RCMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBJTX vs. RCMTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBJTX is a Hold and RCMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBJTX (24.1B) and RCMTX (24.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBJTX pays higher dividends than RCMTX: FBJTX (1.17) vs RCMTX (0.65). FBJTX was incepted earlier than RCMTX: FBJTX (11 years) vs RCMTX (15 years). RCMTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FBJTX (0.48). FBJTX (5.00) and RCMTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBJTX (250) and RCMTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.90 vs. RCMTX (5.24). FBJTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.21 vs. RCMTX (40.32).
| FBJTX | RCMTX | FBJTX / RCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.03 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.03 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.493 | -1.671 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 24.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.65 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 5.24 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.64 | 17.11 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.21 | 40.32 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.31 | 59.29 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...