Ad is loading...
FBJTX vs RHJTX
FBJTX vs RHJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBJTX vs. RHJTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBJTX is a Hold and RHJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBJTX (24.2B) and RHJTX (24.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBJTX (1.17) and RHJTX (1.12) have matching dividends . FBJTX was incepted earlier than RHJTX: FBJTX (11 years) vs RHJTX (9 years). RHJTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FBJTX (0.48). FBJTX (5.00) and RHJTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBJTX (250) and RHJTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBJTX (6.05) and RHJTX (5.79) have marching annual gain over last year. FBJTX (44.91) and RHJTX (42.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBJTX | RHJTX | FBJTX / RHJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.53 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.53 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.072 | -1.499 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 24.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.12 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 5.79 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.14 | 18.40 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.91 | 42.84 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...