Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKTX vs MFJCX
FBKTX vs MFJCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKTX vs. MFJCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKTX is a Hold and MFJCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFJCX pays higher dividends than FBKTX: MFJCX (1.36) vs FBKTX (0.96). FBKTX was incepted earlier than MFJCX: FBKTX (10 years) vs MFJCX (9 years). MFJCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FBKTX (0.48). MFJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FBKTX (5.00). FBKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJCX: FBKTX (250) vs MFJCX (1000). FBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. MFJCX (11.13). FBKTX (50.87) and MFJCX (50.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBKTX | MFJCX | FBKTX / MFJCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.58 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.93 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.114 | 13.329 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.36 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 11.13 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.12 | 39.39 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.87 | 50.34 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement