Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKTX vs MFJCX
FBKTX vs MFJCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKTX vs. MFJCX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKTX is a Hold and MFJCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBKTX has more cash in the bank: 18B vs. MFJCX (251M). MFJCX pays higher dividends than FBKTX: MFJCX (1.34) vs FBKTX (0.92). FBKTX was incepted earlier than MFJCX: FBKTX (11 years) vs MFJCX (9 years). MFJCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FBKTX (0.48). MFJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FBKTX (5.00). FBKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJCX: FBKTX (250) vs MFJCX (1000). FBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. MFJCX (6.09). FBKTX (38.79) and MFJCX (37.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBKTX | MFJCX | FBKTX / MFJCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.57 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.91 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.709 | 9.825 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18B | 251M | 7,171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.34 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 6.09 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.10 | 31.83 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.79 | 37.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement