Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKTX vs RBNTX
FBKTX vs RBNTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKTX vs. RBNTX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKTX is a Hold and RBNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBKTX (18.1B) and RBNTX (18.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBKTX pays higher dividends than RBNTX: FBKTX (0.96) vs RBNTX (0.16). FBKTX was incepted earlier than RBNTX: FBKTX (10 years) vs RBNTX (10 years). RBNTX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FBKTX (0.48). FBKTX (5.00) and RBNTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBKTX (250) and RBNTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.87 vs. RBNTX (14.72). FBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 49.18 vs. RBNTX (43.48).
| FBKTX | RBNTX | FBKTX / RBNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.48 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.48 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.443 | 15.699 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 18.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.16 | 595% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.87 | 14.72 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.25 | 47.66 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.18 | 43.48 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.39 | 111.92 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement