Ad is loading...
FBKTX vs RHKTX
FBKTX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKTX vs. RHKTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKTX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBKTX (15B) and RHKTX (15B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBKTX (1.11) and RHKTX (1.06) have matching dividends . FBKTX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FBKTX (10 years) vs RHKTX (9 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FBKTX (0.48). FBKTX (5.00) and RHKTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBKTX (250) and RHKTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBKTX (5.95) and RHKTX (5.80) have marching annual gain over last year. FBKTX (45.83) and RHKTX (45.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBKTX | RHKTX | FBKTX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.53 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.53 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.622 | -1.685 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15B | 15B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.06 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 5.80 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.64 | 19.40 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.83 | 45.45 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...