Ad is loading...
FBKWX vs FIWGX
FBKWX vs FIWGX Comparison
Open Charts FBKWX vs FIWGX
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Z
Price$9.48
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.03B
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core
Price$9.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.58B
FBKWX vs FIWGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKWX vs. FIWGX commentary
May 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKWX is a Hold and FIWGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIWGX has more cash in the bank: 72.6B vs. FBKWX (39B). FBKWX pays higher dividends than FIWGX: FBKWX (4.54) vs FIWGX (4.30). FBKWX was incepted earlier than FIWGX: FBKWX (10 years) vs FIWGX (7 years). FIWGX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FBKWX (0.39). FIWGX (207.00) and FBKWX (206.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBKWX (0) and FIWGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIWGX (6.05) and FBKWX (6.00) have marching annual gain over last year. FBKWX return over 5 years is better than : 2.41 vs. FIWGX (-0.98).
| FBKWX | FIWGX | FBKWX / FIWGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.17 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.42 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.214 | 2.466 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39B | 72.6B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 4.30 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | 6.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.19 | 7.76 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.41 | -0.98 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers