Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBLAX vs RLBFX
FBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FBLAX vs RLBFX
FBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBLAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBLAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBLAX (3.44B). FBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FBLAX (4.27) vs RLBFX (2.02). FBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FBLAX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FBLAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBLAX (42.27). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBLAX: RLBFX (250) vs FBLAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. FBLAX (12.91). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. FBLAX (20.12).
| FBLAX | RLBFX | FBLAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.30 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.925 | 8.678 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.44B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 2.02 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.91 | 14.33 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.53 | 44.47 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.12 | 35.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.07 | 92.13 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement