Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMCX vs RLBBX
FBMCX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts FBMCX vs RLBBX
FBMCX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMCX vs. RLBBX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMCX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FBMCX (3.4B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: FBMCX (3.60) vs RLBBX (1.12). FBMCX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: FBMCX (20 years) vs RLBBX (24 years). FBMCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.33). RLBBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBMCX (42.27). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMCX: RLBBX (250) vs FBMCX (1000). FBMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.17 vs. RLBBX (5.55). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 26.21 vs. FBMCX (16.11).
| FBMCX | RLBBX | FBMCX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.33 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.33 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.140 | 7.461 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 1.12 | 321% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.17 | 5.55 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.63 | 37.85 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.11 | 26.21 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.51 | 74.02 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement