Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMCX vs RLBEX
FBMCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FBMCX vs RLBEX
FBMCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMCX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FBMCX (3.44B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FBMCX (3.60) vs RLBEX (1.77). FBMCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FBMCX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FBMCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBMCX (42.27). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMCX: RLBEX (250) vs FBMCX (1000). RLBEX (10.79) and FBMCX (10.40) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 31.73 vs. FBMCX (16.74).
| FBMCX | RLBEX | FBMCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.60 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.60 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.258 | 9.598 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.44B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 1.77 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.40 | 10.79 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.10 | 41.94 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.74 | 31.73 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.25 | 85.01 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement