Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMTX vs FFSFX
FBMTX vs FFSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMTX vs. FFSFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMTX is a Hold and FFSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBMTX has more cash in the bank: 5.25B vs. FFSFX (2.38B). FBMTX (0.92) and FFSFX (0.90) have matching dividends . FBMTX was incepted earlier than FFSFX: FBMTX (5 years) vs FFSFX (6 years). FFSFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FBMTX (0.48). FFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FBMTX (4.00). FFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMTX: FFSFX (0) vs FBMTX (250). FBMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.39 vs. FFSFX (16.49). FBMTX return over 5 years is better than : 62.67 vs. FFSFX (49.30).
| FBMTX | FFSFX | FBMTX / FFSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.68 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.68 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.112 | 14.264 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.25B | 2.38B | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.90 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.39 | 16.49 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.52 | 50.05 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.67 | 49.30 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement