Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMTX vs FFSZX
FBMTX vs FFSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMTX vs. FFSZX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMTX is a Hold and FFSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBMTX has more cash in the bank: 5.25B vs. FFSZX (2.38B). FFSZX pays higher dividends than FBMTX: FFSZX (1.44) vs FBMTX (0.92). FBMTX was incepted earlier than FFSZX: FBMTX (5 years) vs FFSZX (6 years). FBMTX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FFSZX (0.45). FFSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FBMTX (4.00). FFSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMTX: FFSZX (0) vs FBMTX (250). FBMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.39 vs. FFSZX (16.73). FBMTX return over 5 years is better than : 62.67 vs. FFSZX (51.17).
| FBMTX | FFSZX | FBMTX / FFSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.45 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.45 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.112 | 14.415 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.25B | 2.38B | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.44 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.39 | 16.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.52 | 51.20 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.67 | 51.17 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers