Ad is loading...
FBMTX vs RDLTX
FBMTX vs RDLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMTX vs. RDLTX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMTX is a Hold and RDLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBMTX (4.43B) and RDLTX (4.43B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBMTX pays higher dividends than RDLTX: FBMTX (1.05) vs RDLTX (0.84). FBMTX was incepted earlier than RDLTX: FBMTX (5 years) vs RDLTX (5 years). RDLTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FBMTX (0.48). FBMTX (4.00) and RDLTX (4.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBMTX (250) and RDLTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBMTX (10.06) and RDLTX (9.75) have marching annual gain over last year. FBMTX (69.72) and RDLTX (68.53) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBMTX | RDLTX | FBMTX / RDLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.74 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.74 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.892 | 3.736 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 4.43B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.84 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 9.75 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.95 | 33.74 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.72 | 68.53 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |