Ad is loading...
FBMTX vs RHLTX
FBMTX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMTX vs. RHLTX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMTX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBMTX (4.43B) and RHLTX (4.43B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBMTX (1.05) and RHLTX (1.01) have matching dividends . FBMTX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FBMTX (5 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). RHLTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FBMTX (0.48). FBMTX (4.00) and RHLTX (4.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBMTX (250) and RHLTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBMTX (10.06) and RHLTX (9.97) have marching annual gain over last year. RHLTX (70.30) and FBMTX (69.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBMTX | RHLTX | FBMTX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.53 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.53 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.892 | 3.840 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 4.43B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.01 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 9.97 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.95 | 34.62 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.72 | 70.30 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...