Ad is loading...
FBMTX vs SSFKX
FBMTX vs SSFKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMTX vs. SSFKX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMTX is a Hold and SSFKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBMTX has more cash in the bank: 4.43B vs. SSFKX (384M). SSFKX pays higher dividends than FBMTX: SSFKX (2.35) vs FBMTX (1.05). FBMTX was incepted earlier than SSFKX: FBMTX (5 years) vs SSFKX (5 years). FBMTX (0.48) is less costly to investors than SSFKX (0.24). SSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. FBMTX (4.00). SSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMTX: SSFKX (0) vs FBMTX (250). SSFKX (10.29) and FBMTX (10.06) have marching annual gain over last year. FBMTX return over 5 years is better than : 69.72 vs. SSFKX (63.85).
| FBMTX | SSFKX | FBMTX / SSFKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.09 | 533% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.24 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.892 | 4.050 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 384M | 1,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 2.35 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 10.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.95 | 33.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.72 | 63.85 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |