FBP
Price
$21.45
Change
+$0.25 (+1.18%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
5 days until earnings call
SLRK
Price
$9.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

FBP vs SLRK

Header iconFBP vs SLRK Comparison
Open Charts FBP vs SLRKBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$21.45
Change+$0.25 (+1.18%)
Volume$575.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Solera National Ban
Price$9.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.12K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FBP vs SLRK Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FBP vs. SLRK commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBP is a StrongSell and SLRK is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FBP: $21.45 vs. SLRK: $9.89)
Brand notoriety: FBP and SLRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBP: 59% vs. SLRK: 86%
Market capitalization -- FBP: $2.93B vs. SLRK: $16.96M
FBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.93B. SLRK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLRK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBP is a better buy in the long-term than SLRK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FBP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

FBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.41% price change this week, while SLRK (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBP is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBP($2.94B) has a higher market cap than SLRK($17M). FBP YTD gains are higher at: 33.875 vs. SLRK (1.374). SLRK has less debt than FBP: SLRK (20.6M) vs FBP (662M). FBP has higher revenues than SLRK: FBP (897M) vs SLRK (10.7M).
FBPSLRKFBP / SLRK
Capitalization2.94B17M17,265%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.8751.3742,466%
P/E Ratio10.12N/A-
Revenue897M10.7M8,383%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt662M20.6M3,214%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBP vs SLRK: Fundamental Ratings
FBP
SLRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1638
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12100
SMR RATING
1..100
115
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3283
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLRK's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBP (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SLRK’s stock grew significantly faster than FBP’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLRK (100) in the null industry. This means that FBP’s stock grew significantly faster than SLRK’s over the last 12 months.

SLRK's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as FBP (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SLRK’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SLRK (50) in the null industry. This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to SLRK’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLRK (83) in the null industry. This means that FBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

FBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBP has been closely correlated with OFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBP jumps, then OFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBP
1D Price
Change %
FBP100%
+1.18%
OFG - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
HWC - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
BPOP - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
WSFS - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ONB - FBP
84%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
More

SLRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLRK and NEWT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLRK and NEWT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRK
1D Price
Change %
SLRK100%
+0.41%
NEWT - SLRK
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
MDIBY - SLRK
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
EFSC - SLRK
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
FBP - SLRK
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
OFG - SLRK
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More