FBPI
Price
$11.72
Change
+$0.47 (+4.18%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.06M
43 days until earnings call
FDVA
Price
$11.65
Change
+$0.05 (+0.43%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
89.41M
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBPI vs FDVA

Header iconFBPI vs FDVA Comparison
Open Charts FBPI vs FDVABanner chart's image
First Bancorp of Indiana
Price$11.72
Change+$0.47 (+4.18%)
Volume$1.87K
Capitalization16.06M
FREEDOM FINL
Price$11.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.43%)
Volume$234
Capitalization89.41M
FBPI vs FDVA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBPI vs. FDVA commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBPI is a Buy and FDVA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FBPI: $11.72 vs. FDVA: $11.65)
Brand notoriety: FBPI and FDVA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBPI: 166% vs. FDVA: 17%
Market capitalization -- FBPI: $16.06M vs. FDVA: $89.41M
FBPI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.06M. FDVA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $89.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBPI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFDVA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBPI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FDVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBPI is a better buy in the long-term than FDVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBPI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDVA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBPI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FDVA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBPI is a better buy in the short-term than FDVA.

Price Growth

FBPI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.02% price change this week, while FDVA (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBPI is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

FDVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDVA($89.4M) has a higher market cap than FBPI($16.1M). FDVA has higher P/E ratio than FBPI: FDVA (55.48) vs FBPI (10.46). FBPI YTD gains are higher at: 19.516 vs. FDVA (12.888). FDVA has less debt than FBPI: FDVA (61.7M) vs FBPI (101M). FDVA has higher revenues than FBPI: FDVA (29.8M) vs FBPI (18.5M).
FBPIFDVAFBPI / FDVA
Capitalization16.1M89.4M18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.51612.888151%
P/E Ratio10.4655.4819%
Revenue18.5M29.8M62%
Total CashN/A4.11M-
Total Debt101M61.7M164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBPI vs FDVA: Fundamental Ratings
FBPI
FDVA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4985
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
8186
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBPI's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDVA (92). This means that FBPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

FDVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBPI (100). This means that FDVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBPI’s over the last 12 months.

FBPI's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as FDVA (86). This means that FBPI’s stock grew similarly to FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

FBPI's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FDVA (52). This means that FBPI’s stock grew similarly to FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

FDVA's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FBPI (18). This means that FDVA’s stock grew similarly to FBPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBPIFDVA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
24%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SONN7.080.60
+9.26%
Sonnet BioTherapeutics Holdings Inc
TM201.382.60
+1.31%
Toyota Motor Corp
BRFS4.180.02
+0.48%
BRF - Brasil Foods SA
NVAX8.39-0.17
-1.99%
Novavax
DDD2.24-0.09
-3.86%
3D Systems Corp

FBPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBPI and CIHKY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBPI and CIHKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBPI
1D Price
Change %
FBPI100%
+4.64%
CIHKY - FBPI
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
NCXS - FBPI
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - FBPI
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBTT - FBPI
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDVA - FBPI
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FDVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDVA and GPFOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDVA and GPFOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDVA
1D Price
Change %
FDVA100%
N/A
GPFOF - FDVA
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNRN - FDVA
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
CBWA - FDVA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
ISTR - FDVA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
ESQ - FDVA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
More