FBSFF
Price
$16.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
SWVL
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

FBSFF vs SWVL

Header iconFBSFF vs SWVL Comparison
Open Charts FBSFF vs SWVLBanner chart's image
Fabasoft AG
Price$16.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Swvl Holdings
Price$3.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$43.44K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FBSFF vs SWVL Comparison Chart
Loading...
SWVL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FBSFF vs. SWVL commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSFF is a Hold and SWVL is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FBSFF: $16.61 vs. SWVL: $3.50)
Brand notoriety: FBSFF and SWVL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBSFF: 75% vs. SWVL: 87%
Market capitalization -- FBSFF: $222.5M vs. SWVL: $80.48M
FBSFF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $222.5M. SWVL’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $80.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBSFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWVL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWVL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWVL is a better buy in the long-term than FBSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SWVL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SWVL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FBSFF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWVL (@Packaged Software) price change was +16.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

SWVL is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBSFF($222M) has a higher market cap than SWVL($80.5M). FBSFF has higher P/E ratio than SWVL: FBSFF (31.65) vs SWVL (1.02). SWVL YTD gains are higher at: 109.130 vs. FBSFF (-19.173). FBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.4M vs. SWVL (-118.47M). FBSFF has more cash in the bank: 26.6M vs. SWVL (19.3M). SWVL has less debt than FBSFF: SWVL (6.18M) vs FBSFF (7.49M). FBSFF (69.2M) and SWVL (66.2M) have equivalent revenues.
FBSFFSWVLFBSFF / SWVL
Capitalization222M80.5M276%
EBITDA17.4M-118.47M-15%
Gain YTD-19.173109.130-18%
P/E Ratio31.651.023,114%
Revenue69.2M66.2M105%
Total Cash26.6M19.3M138%
Total Debt7.49M6.18M121%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWVL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SWVL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

FBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSFF and SWVL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSFF and SWVL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSFF
1D Price
Change %
FBSFF100%
N/A
SWVL - FBSFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
EBYH - FBSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUEN - FBSFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBLG - FBSFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
LKCO - FBSFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
More

SWVL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWVL and FBSFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWVL and FBSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWVL
1D Price
Change %
SWVL100%
+3.57%
FBSFF - SWVL
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETWO - SWVL
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
JG - SWVL
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.69%
ALRM - SWVL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
CCCS - SWVL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More